29 Apr 2006 23:55:16
Good Deal
Muster 96 = CHEATER....

another guy who SUDDENLY and SUSPICIOUSLY reached his peak at ANCIENT age of
29..

muster, rafter, korda....

korda was the only unlucky one who got caught...

the other two cheaters got away w/ murder...




30 Apr 2006 07:07:54
Dave Hazelwood
Re: Muster 96 = CHEATER....

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:55:16 -0700, "Good Deal" <gogo@hotmail.com > wrote:

>another guy who SUDDENLY and SUSPICIOUSLY reached his peak at ANCIENT age of
>29..
>
>muster, rafter, korda....
>
>korda was the only unlucky one who got caught...
>
>the other two cheaters got away w/ murder...
>


will they catch Nadal ? Do they want to ?


30 Apr 2006 02:14:22
Bernd Karbacher
Re: Muster 96 = CHEATER....

You think he bribed the linesmen?

Good Deal wrote:
> another guy who SUDDENLY and SUSPICIOUSLY reached his peak at ANCIENT age of
> 29..
>
> muster, rafter, korda....
>
> korda was the only unlucky one who got caught...
>
> the other two cheaters got away w/ murder...



30 Apr 2006 10:48:29
Jack
Re: Muster 96 = CHEATER....


> another guy who SUDDENLY and SUSPICIOUSLY reached his peak at ANCIENT age
of
> 29..
>
> muster, rafter, korda....
>
> korda was the only unlucky one who got caught...
>
> the other two cheaters got away w/ murder...

Muster won 42 of 44 titles before turning age 29. Not only did Rafter play
his last ATP match before turning 29, he won his US Open titles when he was
24 & 25.

Where do you guys come up with this stuff? Geez....




30 Apr 2006 18:01:06
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mikko_=C4mm=E4l
Re: Muster 96 = CHEATER....

Jack wrote:
>>another guy who SUDDENLY and SUSPICIOUSLY reached his peak at ANCIENT age
>
> of
>
>>29..
>>
>>muster, rafter, korda....
>>
>>korda was the only unlucky one who got caught...
>>
>>the other two cheaters got away w/ murder...
>
>
> Muster won 42 of 44 titles before turning age 29. Not only did Rafter play
> his last ATP match before turning 29, he won his US Open titles when he was
> 24 & 25.
>
> Where do you guys come up with this stuff? Geez....

Odd indeed. Muster was top tenner way earlier and only Courier in his
prime stopped Muster at FO (twice) early 90:ies. Also Muster already won
7 titles 1993 alone...

Also Rafter was really good 1994- > but severe injuries prevented him
from greater succee. And 1997 was a great year but 1998 was even better.

Like it or not but fast court competition really was having its
lackluster years 97-98 after Becker, Edberg, Stich had quitted and HC
goodies like Courier, Chang suddenly had started to have some serious
hiccups...

Just look at what players made fast court later rounds at non-clay slams
97-98 (philippoussis, rios, moya, kucera, bjorkman, korda, rusedski,
pioline, woodbridge...) and had surprise enters at top10....

.mikko


30 Apr 2006 12:07:34
Good Deal
Re: Muster 96 = CHEATER....

when you have a guy winning his FIRST ever grand slam and reaching world #1
at age of 29...
you put a BIG question mark beside it...

like i said.. some are caught (korda, rusedski).. some didn't....(rafter,
muster, sampras, mac)

"Mikko Ämmälä" <michaelb@mail.suomi.net > wrote in message
news:4454ced2$0$10686$9b536df3@news.fv.fi...
> Jack wrote:
>>>another guy who SUDDENLY and SUSPICIOUSLY reached his peak at ANCIENT age
>>
>> of
>>
>>>29..
>>>
>>>muster, rafter, korda....
>>>
>>>korda was the only unlucky one who got caught...
>>>
>>>the other two cheaters got away w/ murder...
>>
>>
>> Muster won 42 of 44 titles before turning age 29. Not only did Rafter
>> play
>> his last ATP match before turning 29, he won his US Open titles when he
>> was
>> 24 & 25.
>>
>> Where do you guys come up with this stuff? Geez....
>
> Odd indeed. Muster was top tenner way earlier and only Courier in his
> prime stopped Muster at FO (twice) early 90:ies. Also Muster already won 7
> titles 1993 alone...
>
> Also Rafter was really good 1994-> but severe injuries prevented him from
> greater succee. And 1997 was a great year but 1998 was even better.
>
> Like it or not but fast court competition really was having its lackluster
> years 97-98 after Becker, Edberg, Stich had quitted and HC goodies like
> Courier, Chang suddenly had started to have some serious hiccups...
>
> Just look at what players made fast court later rounds at non-clay slams
> 97-98 (philippoussis, rios, moya, kucera, bjorkman, korda, rusedski,
> pioline, woodbridge...) and had surprise enters at top10....
>
> .mikko




30 Apr 2006 22:29:33
Jack
Re: Muster 96 = CHEATER....

> when you have a guy winning his FIRST ever grand slam and reaching world
#1
> at age of 29...
> you put a BIG question mark beside it...

Who reached #1 at age 29? Not Muster. Not Rafter. Not Korda.

Who won his first grand slam title at age 29? Not Muster. Not Rafter.

Who exactly are you putting a question mark next to based on this criteria?

> like i said.. some are caught (korda, rusedski).. some didn't....(rafter,
> muster, sampras, mac)




30 Apr 2006 21:28:38
Good Deal
Re: Muster 96 = CHEATER....

whatever.. 28.5 yrs old..
round up to 29...


"Jack" <jrcunniff@no.spam.comcast.net > wrote in message
news:UdOdneyzLrn87cjZRVn-qA@comcast.com...
>> when you have a guy winning his FIRST ever grand slam and reaching world
> #1
>> at age of 29...
>> you put a BIG question mark beside it...
>
> Who reached #1 at age 29? Not Muster. Not Rafter. Not Korda.
>
> Who won his first grand slam title at age 29? Not Muster. Not Rafter.
>
> Who exactly are you putting a question mark next to based on this
> criteria?
>
>> like i said.. some are caught (korda, rusedski).. some didn't....(rafter,
>> muster, sampras, mac)
>
>




03 May 2006 06:08:07
GregRupedski
Re: Muster 96 = CHEATER....


"Good Deal" <gogo@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:44550afa$1_1@news.cybersurf.net...
> when you have a guy winning his FIRST ever grand slam and reaching world
#1
> at age of 29...
> you put a BIG question mark beside it...
>
> like i said.. some are caught (korda, rusedski).. some didn't....(rafter,
> muster, sampras, mac)

So you think Rafter, Muster, Sampras and Mac were using....but say, Edberg,
Becker, Lendl, Federer, Roddick, Hewitt were/are not? lol.