13 Jul 2004 19:01:29
alvey
Alvey's Early Slump Alert Stats - 13 July 2004


And if the formatting doesn't come out then bad luck. I just can't get
the fucker (Mozilla) to format.

Last 6 inn Last 10 inn Last 15 inn Inns since
Runs Ave Runs Ave Runs Ave last 100
Hayden 341 56.8 571 57.1 874 62.4 1
Langer 395 65.8 451 45.1 641 42.7 2
Ponting 216 36.0 337 33.7 917 65.5 12
Lehman 333 55.5 554 55.4 892 59.5 6
Martyn 222 37.0 536 53.6 682 45.5 7
Katich 126 21.0 388 43.1 546 42.0 8
Clang 168 33.6 316 35.1 412 29.4 7

Wkts Ave Wkts Ave Wkts Ave
McGrath 11 22.7 18 21.6 22 25.5
Lee 11 59.1 17 50.9 30 38.1
Gillespie 10 41.1 16 37.1 22 41.1
Warne 15 30.6 35 22.1 48 21.5
Kaspa 12 24.7 20 25.2 25 33.8


13 Jul 2004 09:25:48
Cicero
Re: Alvey's Early Slump Alert Stats - 13 July 2004


"alvey" <alvey_earwax_sidecast@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:2lhmp7Fcp601U1@uni-berlin.de...
>
> And if the formatting doesn't come out then bad luck. I just can't get
> the fucker (Mozilla) to format.
>
> Last 6 inn Last 10 inn Last 15 inn Inns since
> Runs Ave Runs Ave Runs Ave last 100
> Hayden 341 56.8 571 57.1 874 62.4 1
> Langer 395 65.8 451 45.1 641 42.7 2
> Ponting 216 36.0 337 33.7 917 65.5 12
> Lehman 333 55.5 554 55.4 892 59.5 6
> Martyn 222 37.0 536 53.6 682 45.5 7
> Katich 126 21.0 388 43.1 546 42.0 8
> Clang 168 33.6 316 35.1 412 29.4 7
>
> Wkts Ave Wkts Ave Wkts Ave
> McGrath 11 22.7 18 21.6 22 25.5
> Lee 11 59.1 17 50.9 30 38.1
> Gillespie 10 41.1 16 37.1 22 41.1
> Warne 15 30.6 35 22.1 48 21.5
> Kaspa 12 24.7 20 25.2 25 33.8

Alvey, this doesn't make sense to me. If Hayden scored a century in his most
recent innings, how can he have had 1 innings since his last century? Same
logic applies to Langer- I think your heading needs adjustment- or the
stats.




13 Jul 2004 09:43:08
Jeff Cook
Re: Alvey's Early Slump Alert Stats - 13 July 2004


"Cicero" <moofie.cicero@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:wUNIc.92053$sj4.81434@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> Alvey, this doesn't make sense to me. If Hayden scored a century in his
most
> recent innings, how can he have had 1 innings since his last century? Same
> logic applies to Langer- I think your heading needs adjustment- or the
> stats.
>

I guess from one perspective, you could say the ton was 1 innings ago. The
heading certainly seems to imply that there has been an innings in between.




13 Jul 2004 19:43:29
alvey
Re: Alvey's Early Slump Alert Stats - 13 July 2004

Cicero wrote:

snip beautifully formatted tables


>
> Alvey, this doesn't make sense to me. If Hayden scored a century in his most
> recent innings, how can he have had 1 innings since his last century? Same
> logic applies to Langer- I think your heading needs adjustment- or the
> stats.
>
>
It's a Y2k variant. The alternative is to say that it's zero innings
since his last 100.



alvey


13 Jul 2004 10:58:48
Jeff Cook
Re: Alvey's Early Slump Alert Stats - 13 July 2004


"alvey" <alvey_earwax_sidecast@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:2lhp7uFcivhmU2@uni-berlin.de...
> Cicero wrote:
>
> snip beautifully formatted tables
>
>
> >
> > Alvey, this doesn't make sense to me. If Hayden scored a century in his
most
> > recent innings, how can he have had 1 innings since his last century?
Same
> > logic applies to Langer- I think your heading needs adjustment- or the
> > stats.
> >
> >
> It's a Y2k variant. The alternative is to say that it's zero innings
> since his last 100.
>
>
>
> alvey

It is zero innings since his last 100, ie he has had no innings at all since
he scored his last 100




13 Jul 2004 21:15:57
alvey
Re: Alvey's Early Slump Alert Stats - 13 July 2004

Jeff Cook wrote:

> "alvey" <alvey_earwax_sidecast@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:2lhp7uFcivhmU2@uni-berlin.de...
>
>>Cicero wrote:
>>
>>snip beautifully formatted tables
>>
>>
>>
>>>Alvey, this doesn't make sense to me. If Hayden scored a century in his
>
> most
>
>>>recent innings, how can he have had 1 innings since his last century?
>
> Same
>
>>>logic applies to Langer- I think your heading needs adjustment- or the
>>>stats.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>It's a Y2k variant. The alternative is to say that it's zero innings
>>since his last 100.
>>
>>
>>
>>alvey
>
>
> It is zero innings since his last 100, ie he has had no innings at all since
> he scored his last 100
>
>
But if it's not his current innings then it must be his last innings.
heh heh heh.


13 Jul 2004 11:38:15
Jeff Cook
Re: Alvey's Early Slump Alert Stats - 13 July 2004


"alvey" <alvey_earwax_sidecast@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:2lhuldFd0ufoU1@uni-berlin.de...
> Jeff Cook wrote:
>
> > "alvey" <alvey_earwax_sidecast@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:2lhp7uFcivhmU2@uni-berlin.de...
> >
> >>Cicero wrote:
> >>
> >>snip beautifully formatted tables
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Alvey, this doesn't make sense to me. If Hayden scored a century in his
> >
> > most
> >
> >>>recent innings, how can he have had 1 innings since his last century?
> >
> > Same
> >
> >>>logic applies to Langer- I think your heading needs adjustment- or the
> >>>stats.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>It's a Y2k variant. The alternative is to say that it's zero innings
> >>since his last 100.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>alvey
> >
> >
> > It is zero innings since his last 100, ie he has had no innings at all
since
> > he scored his last 100
> >
> >
> But if it's not his current innings then it must be his last innings.
> heh heh heh.

Yeah, it's a tricky one. They can both be right depending on how you look
at it.




13 Jul 2004 21:06:20
Cicero
Re: Alvey's Early Slump Alert Stats - 13 July 2004


"Jeff Cook" <someone@microsoft.com > wrote in message
news:HQPIc.92315$sj4.86694@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "alvey" <alvey_earwax_sidecast@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:2lhuldFd0ufoU1@uni-berlin.de...
> > Jeff Cook wrote:
> >
> > > "alvey" <alvey_earwax_sidecast@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > news:2lhp7uFcivhmU2@uni-berlin.de...
> > >
> > >>Cicero wrote:
> > >>
> > >>snip beautifully formatted tables
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>Alvey, this doesn't make sense to me. If Hayden scored a century in
his
> > >
> > > most
> > >
> > >>>recent innings, how can he have had 1 innings since his last century?
> > >
> > > Same
> > >
> > >>>logic applies to Langer- I think your heading needs adjustment- or
the
> > >>>stats.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>It's a Y2k variant. The alternative is to say that it's zero innings
> > >>since his last 100.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>alvey
> > >
> > >
> > > It is zero innings since his last 100, ie he has had no innings at all
> since
> > > he scored his last 100
> > >
> > >
> > But if it's not his current innings then it must be his last innings.
> > heh heh heh.

But if he was not out, would it be his current innings? (even if the match
is over).

Cicero, sure that Alvey is happy that humans are reading his posts.




14 Jul 2004 16:43:19
alvey
Re: Alvey's Early Slump Alert Stats - 13 July 2004

Cicero wrote:
> "Jeff Cook" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:HQPIc.92315$sj4.86694@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
>>"alvey" <alvey_earwax_sidecast@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:2lhuldFd0ufoU1@uni-berlin.de...
>>
>>>Jeff Cook wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"alvey" <alvey_earwax_sidecast@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:2lhp7uFcivhmU2@uni-berlin.de...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Cicero wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>snip beautifully formatted tables
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Alvey, this doesn't make sense to me. If Hayden scored a century in
>
> his
>
>>>>most
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>recent innings, how can he have had 1 innings since his last century?
>>>>
>>>>Same
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>logic applies to Langer- I think your heading needs adjustment- or
>
> the
>
>>>>>>stats.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>It's a Y2k variant. The alternative is to say that it's zero innings
>>>>>since his last 100.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>alvey
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>It is zero innings since his last 100, ie he has had no innings at all
>>
>>since
>>
>>>>he scored his last 100
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>But if it's not his current innings then it must be his last innings.
>>>heh heh heh.
>
>
> But if he was not out, would it be his current innings? (even if the match
> is over).

Hark! The pleasing sound of distant barrels being scraped.
You've answered your own question. The match is over.
>
> Cicero, sure that Alvey is happy that humans are reading his posts.

You mean this isn't SETI? Damn.